DVD : Charlie's Angels [Special Edition] widescreen

DVD : Charlie's Angels [Special Edition] widescreen

Charlie's Angels [Special Edition] widescreen

avec: Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, Lucy Liu, Bill Murray, Sam Rockwell
réalisé par: Joseph McGinty Nichol



Charlie's Angels [Special Edition] widescreen
Agrandissez cette image.


Note moyenne:  out of 5 stars
Sales Rank: 17084






More Info


Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Audience Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Binding: DVD
EAN: 9780767861724
Format: Dubbed, NTSC, Special Edition, Subtitled, Widescreen
ISBN: 0767861728
Label: Columbia TriStar
Manufacturer: Columbia TriStar
Picture Format: Anamorphic Widescreen
Publisher: Columbia TriStar
Region Code: 1
Release Date: novembre 29, 2001
Sales Rank: 17084
Studio: Columbia TriStar
Theatrical Release Date: novembre 03, 2000



More Info
















Produits similaires:
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (Widescreen) Miss Congeniality X-Men Trilogy (X-Men/X2: X-Men United/X-Men 3: The Last Stand) Wild Wild West (Widescreen) Live Free or Die Hard (Unrated Widescreen Edition) la suite

Produits similaires:




L'avis des consommateurs
Note moyenne:  out of 5 stars

Note: 3 out of 5 stars - This is film tries too hard to be can be campy.
Attorneys Angels has everything in it except the kitchen sink. There are fake disguises; there's Bill Murray and even the Matrix. So, why not five-stars? While it seems like not only is the kitchen sink missing, but also so is the scripting, any sense of pathos, or attempt to be entertaining. Ah, you ask, "what about action that passes at the time?" well that's why this is not a to star review. I would say more but I do not want to give away the few surprises that this movie has.





Note: 5 out of 5 stars - Great xtra's. 22nd june 2004.
Far better than the video, and cheap in some places to buy. The featurettes are ace especcially the martialarts one. The film is unmissable and i can't get enofe of either of them. I love it.



Note: 1 out of 5 stars - * Sexy images dont cut it for me ...
If your some kind of perv, or a kid who isnt old enough to buy porn yet, then watching these chicks wearing sexy clothing is probably gonnah distract you from the fact that there is pretty pethetic acting and not much of a plot going on at all!

But if your like me, and see through that BS of there idea that "sex image" sells, then this movie is a worthless waste of time!

Even tho Drew Barrymore said, the reason for it is because she is against guns and dosent want to use them.... it dosent mean that [breasts] and bikinis are going to make it all better, and give it a new twist in a plot, because I didnt see much of one ... and when i see 5 star reviews to this garbage, i straigh away know it's a guy whose reveiwing with somthing other thats not his head!

Hollywood need to drop this idea of making action movies with woman wearing next to nothing, and make a decent action film with woman who are respectable for there performace, and most of all, ACT!



Note: 4 out of 5 stars - Great updated tribute to the Angels
In 2000, media rumblings had Charlie's Angels: the Movie set to tank like Waterworld. Reports of Bill Murray and Lucy Liu refusing to work with each other, rapidly inflating budget, and former angels declining cameos had many folks apprehensive about the film's success. But the finished product was refreshing and worth waiting for. Ironically, in persevering with the film,
the three young stars and co-producers, Drew Barrymore, Cameron Diaz, and Liu followed the Angels' creed of never giving up and believing in yourself.

From the familiar opening strains of the TV show's music to the end, the movie remains true to the original series, yet is modern and updated. Barry is cute, Liu is tough, and Diaz simply dazzles. Lots of humor and action make this film a must-see. There is one especially hilarious scene that makes fun of engineers. Two of the angels dress up as men, and Liu dons a black leather miniskirt to distract the men. It works very well as the engineers are all falling out of their seats and looking at her in awe as she works the "dominatrix" role.

And it is great to have John Forsythe back as the voice of Charlie. At least he was a good sport about it; a true gentleman like Charlie!



Note: 4 out of 5 stars - * Quirky Girls Having Fun ...
Not a bad idea with quirky girls wanting to have fun and saving the world from evil while they're at it. How do they have the time to do that and balance their social lives? I don't know.

Surprisingly good fun despite the misgivings I had at first. Manged to tie in a fast-moving plot and humor. Bill Murray is great.

read more customer reviews on Charlie's Angels [Special Edition] widescreen


Rechercher des produits similaires par rubrique:

 




Cooking Contests - Magic Chef Refrigerators | | | | | | | | Generic Sonata | Cheaper Meridia |



Gifts


We've covered in too much detail how it's some sort of "open season" on Vonage when it comes to VoIP patents. After dealing with ridiculous and expensive patent lawsuits from companies who failed to actually innovate in the same way Vonage did, the company was pressured by Wall Street to quickly settle the various patent lawsuits filed against the company. Of course, rather than settle matters, that simply opened the door for other companies to go searching through their patent portfolios to see if there was anything they could sue Vonage over. Indeed, following those settlements it didn't take long for AT&T to dig up a patent and sue -- which was quickly settled as well. Thought things were over? No such luck. Nortel just showed up last month to sue and it took all of about a week and a half for Vonage to settle that case as well.

The Nortel case is slightly different because Vonage actually already had a patent infringement lawsuit going against Nortel, but it wasn't really initiated by Vonage. Instead, it had been initiated by a patent holding firm that Vonage bought in 2006. The end result of the settlement doesn't involve money changing hands, but just a cross licensing agreement for the patents. So what's the big lesson that Vonage and others have learned from this? It's certainly got nothing to do with innovating. It's to hoard as many patents as possible so that you have your own nuclear stockpile for when someone else sues you. Want to know why the USPTO is overwhelmed? It's not because there aren't enough examiners (as some will claim) or that there aren't enough funds. It's because the way the system now works is that you are supposed to file patents on every tiny little advancement so you can use it to protect yourself against lawsuits from everyone else. That's not about innovation. It's about waste. In the meantime, since it's still open season at Vonage, who's going to be next? There are a ton of other patents in the VoIP space that can surely be used in a lawsuit, right?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

Small and light enough for a shirt pocket, Samsung's Helix YX-M1 is a one-stop audio entertainment center with an XM radio, a digital music player, and room for 50 hours of tunes, but it comes up short on battery life.

This raw work-flow application isn't the Holy Grail many hoped it would be, but Apple Aperture 1.5 could make life easier for photographers who need to cull, retouch, and output large numbers of photographs quickly and efficiently.


Shopping at dvd.cadeauxcanada.com  Created at Thu Dec 4 03:23:47 2008